Our proposal is to allow artificial intelligence during exams under specific conditions, strictly contained within a restricted environment.
Marion GUILLARD - Mathis DUCHER - Kathleen SOMERS
INSA Lyon, Telecommunications Department
Integrating AI into high-stakes assessment requires a balance of security, ethics, and critical thinking. Our framework treats the LLM as a finite, monitored resource.
Institutions deploy centralized, secure AI platforms internally. This avoids dependency on external tech giants and ensures absolute data privacy for student sessions.
Usage is limited via a token system. Professors set a specific budget, forcing students to strategically decide when a hint or verification is truly necessary.
Real-time carbon tracking educates students about the physical cost of AI. Minimal usage is rewarded with grade bonuses, encouraging mindful interactions.
Our model ensures that students lacking fundamental understanding still struggle. By restricting tokens (like limiting a cheat sheet), we prevent students from delegating all reasoning to the algorithm.
Teachers gain flexibility: a large budget might test prompt engineering and critical analysis, while a small budget tests basic troubleshooting or knowledge retrieval.
After the session, all prompts are accessible to teachers. This data allows for a deep analysis of student reasoning and their interactions with AI.